Understand how decay and half life work to enable radiometric dating.
Play a game that tests your ability to match the percentage of the dating element that remains to the age of the object.
The topic of radiometric dating has received some of the most vicious attacks by young earth creation science theorists.
However, none of the criticisms of young earth creationists have any scientific merit.
The fluctuation of the amount of C-14 in the atmosphere over time adds a small uncertainty, but contamination by "modern carbon" such as decayed organic matter from soils poses a greater possibility for error. Thomas Seiler, a physicist from Germany, gave the presentation in Singapore.
He said that his team and the laboratories they employed took special care to avoid contamination.
Furthermore, the ratio is known to fluctuate significantly over relatively short periods of time (e.g.
Unfortunately the ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14 has yet to reach a state of equilibrium in our atmosphere; there is more carbon-14 in the air today than there was thousands of years ago.
You can even believe in evolution and be a Christian.What solutions are available for increasing accuracy of the tests? From the source linked above: Carbon-14 is considered to be a highly reliable dating technique.It's accuracy has been verified by using C-14 to date artifacts whose age is known historically.They are then able to calibrate the carbon dating method to produce fairly accurate results.Carbon dating is thus accurate within the timeframe set by other archaeological dating techniques.